UK News

Rishi Sunak cuts taxes on domestic flights days before climate conference starts

Rishi Sunak has been accused of undermining the UK’s response to the climate emergency, with Budget measures to make it cheaper to fly internally and drive greenhouse gas-emitting automobiles.

The strikes – branded “astonishing” and “retrograde” by Friends of the Earth – have been unveiled days forward of the essential Cop26 world warming summit in Glasgow at which Boris Johnson will plead with the worldwide group to chop carbon emissions.

And they got here only a day after the federal government’s personal Climate Change Committee (CCC) advised the prime minister that his administration’s web zero technique had “nothing to say” on aviation and should take additional motion to discourage individuals from flying.

Environmentalists stated {that a} price range assertion which spent longer on reform of alcohol obligation than the federal government’s net-zero targets would successfully “extend the age of fossil fuels” within the UK.

In a price range which he stated would lay the foundations for an “economy fit for a new age of optimism”, the chancellor stated he needed to make inside air journey cheaper to “cut the cost of living”.

From April 2023, air passenger obligation on flights between airports in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland can be lowered from £13 to £6.50 per leg, offset by elevated charges for long-haul routes.

Mr Sunak claimed the coverage would “help cut the cost of living with 9m passengers seeing their duty cut by half”.

“It will bring people together across the United Kingdom, and – because they tend to have a greater proportion of domestic passengers – it is a boost to regional airports like Aberdeen, Inverness and Southampton which are major regional employers.”

But the coverage successfully pushes passengers to change from rail to flying by slicing the value of inside flights at a time when rail fares are set to rise on the quickest rate in a decade from January.

It is the polar reverse of another European nations – which have more and more moved to limit domestic air journey the place rail options can be found.

And the brand new £91 “ultra long haul band” of APD will have an effect on simply 5 per cent of passengers on flights over 5,500 miles.

The Chancellor additionally confirmed he would prolong state assist to English airports for an additional six months to “help them get through the winter”.

And he continued the follow of all Conservative chancellors since 2010 by freezing gasoline obligation, a coverage which has made it more and more cheaper to drive in comparison with extra environmentally sustainable options.

In an announcement earlier this week the CCC – a statutory physique which advises the federal government on its climate change targets – stated choices for reining within the development in aviation ought to be “explored further with a view to early action”.

The CCC stated: “The government does not include an explicit ambition on … reductions in the growth of aviation, and policies for managing travel demand have not been developed to match the funding that has been committed.”

Friends of the Earth’s head of coverage Mike Childs responded with horror to the price range package deal.

“Cutting APD on domestic flights is an astonishing move that completely flies in the face of the climate emergency,” he stated. “The chancellor should be making it cheaper for people to travel around the country by train, not carbon-guzzling planes.

“APD for all flights should have been increased, or even better replaced with a frequent flyers levy, aimed at curbing multiple flights taken by a minority of people each year.

“As the prime minister prepares to host next week’s crucial climate summit, this retrograde step is another illustration that the government’s carbon reduction plans don’t add up.”

Rebecca Newsom, head of politics at Greenpeace UK stated Mr Sunak was “actively making things worse by making it cheaper to fly between UK cities”, whereas James Thornton, chief govt of marketing campaign group ConsumerEarth, stated the announcement on gasoline and domestic flight duties “goes against everything we know about climate change” and warned that the UK had “missed a crucial chance to lead by example”.

Luke Murphy, head of the environmental justice fee on the Institute for Public Policy Research think-tank, stated Mr Sunak had “used the budget to extend the ages of fossil fuels”.

“Cutting air passenger obligation was probably the most important new coverage talked about within the price range speech at the moment which is able to have an effect on greenhouse gasoline emissions – and it’ll improve them. Rishi Sunak talked for longer about beer obligation, than our obligation to future generations to deal with the climate and nature crises,” he said.

“The truth is, this climate-void, fossil-fuel heavy budget failed to deliver the necessary £30 billion of investment needed each year to meet our climate and nature targets.”

And Sam Alvis, head of green renewal at Green Alliance, said the chancellor’s approach to climate was “increasingly difficult to understand”.

“Just days away from a vital climate conference championed by the prime minister, Rishi Sunak barely mentions net zero and encourages people to fly around the UK rather than take the train. The measure on air passenger duty will even cost the Treasury money rather than boost its revenue, he said.

Ed Miliband, Labour’s shadow energy and climate secretary said: “Another price range from the chancellor which failed on each the price of residing disaster and the climate disaster.

“No green recovery, no plan to save families £400 on bills, no plan for green steel. Working people will pay the price of Tory climate delay.”

Back to top button