UK News

Gordon Brown’s blunt comparison between Brexit Britain and North Korea | UK | News

Gordon Brown: It’s irresponsible to speak a couple of referendum

Earlier this week, former Prime Minister Gordon Brown stated the UK will turn out to be a “failed state” except there are deep reforms in the way in which the nation is ruled. Mr Brown’s intervention got here after a Sunday Times ballot discovered folks in all 4 nations of the UK imagine Scotland will go away it within the subsequent decade — with Brexit and the Government’s response to the pandemic seen as having accelerated the pattern. Writing for The Telegraph, Mr Brown stated Britain “must urgently rediscover what holds it together and sort out what is driving us apart”, and warned that the “world’s most successful experiment in multinational living is under greater threat than at any time in 300 years”.

He said: “I believe the choice is now between a reformed state and a failed state.”

Speaking on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme on Monday morning, he also accused Prime Minister Boris Johnson and his Government of being out of touch.

He added: “I do think Boris Johnson has not quite understood how deep the resentment is, how the lack of trust is causing him a problem, a problem about his acceptability in different parts of the country.”

It is just not the primary time Mr Brown, who was Chancellor of the Exchequer for 10 years from 1997 and turned Prime Minister in 2007, has issued a doomsday warning.

In 2015, Mr Brown went so far as to say Britain would have changed into the “North Korea of Europe” if it left the European Union.

The former Prime Minister stated abandoning the 28-nation bloc would have left the UK frozen out of political determination making, whereas forging alliances with new companions would haven’t compensated for the lost commerce from the eurozone.

Writing within the Guardian, he stated: “The Hong Kong option – ‘leaving Europe to join the world’ – is really the North Korea option, out in the cold with few friends, no influence, little new trade and even less new investment.

Gordon Brown’s blunt comparison between Brexit Britain and North Korea (Image: GETTY)

“We should inform the reality in regards to the three million jobs, 25,000 corporations, £200billion of annual exports and £450billion of inward funding linked to Europe; and how the ‘Britzerland’ or Norwegian alternate options (even Norwegians oppose the Norwegian choice) go away us topic to EU guidelines, however denied a vote in shaping them.”

Mr Brown said the Tory Government, at the time led by David Cameron, had already left the UK isolated in Europe.

He added: “Being half-in half-out, a Britain that’s semi-detached and disengaged – the Britain of the empty chair even once we are within the room – has made us weaker than ever: irrelevant on Greece, fringe participant on local weather change, mere spectator within the debate that might have formed a European pro-growth coverage, marginal on Ukraine, with ministers sounding ludicrous as concurrently they are saying, ‘Russia have to be confronted with a extra united Europe’ and, ‘By the way in which, we’re considering of leaving’.”

He urged policymakers to use Britain’s position in Europe to rebuild and strengthen ties with the bloc.

He concluded: “In a decade or two, because the German inhabitants falls, Britain will once more turn out to be Europe’s greatest, strongest economic system.

“It would be a terrible irony if Britain opts out, leaving Europe divided, Russia empowered, the US bypassing us for a Franco-German axis – and Scotland threatening to abandon a non-European UK.”

JUST IN: Sunak advised to take a position extra money in post-Brexit growth 

ctp_video, gordon brown, brexit news, nicola sturgeon, scotland independence, scottish independence,

Former Prime Minister Gordon Brown (Image: GETTY)


Prime Minister Boris Johnson (Image: GETTY)

Mr Brown has prior to now been accused of being the one who “surrendered Britain’s sovereignty to the EU”.

In 2005, the European Commission and the European Council had been pushing for a European Constitution.

However, voters in France and the Netherlands strongly rejected the proposed Constitution in two respective referendums.

Despite the robust opposition within the member states, eurocrats ignored the outcomes of such well-liked votes and the European Constitution was subsequently rebranded because the Lisbon Treaty, which handed in 2007 with no plebiscite.

Writing for the Heritage Foundation, an American conservative public coverage suppose tank primarily based in Washington DC, Nile Gardiner, former aide of Margaret Thatcher, and Sally McNamara, a senior coverage analyst in European affairs, accused Mr Brown of being the “real enemy” of the British folks for undemocratically signing such a treaty.

In a 2008 report, written a year earlier than the Lisbon Treaty got here into drive, the authors stated: “Prime Minister Gordon Brown’s decision to reject a referendum on the new European Union Reform Treaty (Treaty of Lisbon) should be viewed as one of the biggest acts of political betrayal in modern British history.

“Despite a rebellion by 29 of its own backbenchers, the Labour-led Government defeated a Conservative proposal to hold a popular vote on the Lisbon Treaty by 311 votes to 248 in the House of Commons on March 5.

EU insider praises Brexit as UK ‘will reboot economy faster’ [INSIGHT]
France’s plot to take NATO leadership role from Brexit Britain exposed [REVEALED]
EU’s ‘vaccine tactics to push everyone into poverty’ [EXCLUSIVE]

ctp_video, gordon brown, brexit news, nicola sturgeon, scotland independence, scottish independence,

Supreme Leader of North Korea Kim Jong-un (Image: GETTY)

ctp_video, gordon brown, brexit news, nicola sturgeon, scotland independence, scottish independence,

Gordon Brown signs the Lisbon Treaty in 2007 (Image: GETTY)

“Brown’s refusal to support a referendum represented a stunning reversal of the Government’s 2005 manifesto pledge to hold a plebiscite on the European Constitution.”

Mr Gardiner and Ms McNamara added that the Lisbon Treaty paved the way in which for the creation of a “fledgling superstate”, which additional eroded the authorized sovereignty of European nation-states, entrenched a pan-European magistracy, a European Public Prosecutor, a federal EU police drive (“Europol”), and an EU prison code.

They concluded: “The notion that the people of Europe should not have a vote on a treaty with huge implications for the future of the continent demonstrates the utter contempt that the Brussels bureaucracy has for the average man or woman on the street.

“There is little question that if the treaty had been put to a well-liked vote, the electorates of a number of international locations would reject it.

“The whole ‘European Project’ is fundamentally undemocratic, unaccountable, and opaque.

“If subjected to referenda throughout the EU, it will virtually definitely be consigned to the dustbin of historical past.”

Back to top button