PM abandons efforts to block inquiry on misleading Commons over Partygate | Boris Johnson

Boris Johnson has been compelled to abandon efforts to block an inquiry into whether or not he misled MPs over Partygate lockdown breaches, as an alternative urging rebellious MPs to delay any investigation.

Government whips scrambled on Wednesday night time to derail a Labour movement designed to set off a Commons inquiry into whether or not Johnson lied about rule-breaking in Downing Street – together with the potential launch of lots of of damaging messages and pictures.

Amid a rising backlash from Tory MPs, the federal government privately conceded it couldn’t whip them to block an inquiry by the Commons privileges committee. It as an alternative tabled a movement to delay the inquiry till after the publication of the ultimate Partygate report by Sue Gray, a senior civil servant.

Johnson’s MPs have been put on a three-line whip to again the brand new modification. The prime minister, who flew to India for a commerce go to on Wednesday, will swerve the talk and vote on the movement on Thursday.

His allies had earlier briefed that they have been ready to power Tory MPs to vote down the movement from Labour and different opposition events. But even amongst frontbenchers there was palpable disquiet that MPs must be compelled to block an investigation into the prime minister, who obtained a police fixed-penalty discover final week.

One minister admitted it will be arduous to justify Johnson avoiding an investigation for doubtlessly misleading parliament, saying: “If it’s the same process every MP faces, then why should it be different for the PM?”

A authorities spokesperson stated: “The government has tabled an amendment to Labour’s motion which says that consideration of this matter should take place after the conclusion of the police investigation and the publication of the Cabinet Office [Sue Gray] report, allowing MPs to have all the facts at their disposal.”

A Downing Street supply insisted it was not a wrecking modification however stated “now is not the time” to think about the problem. Asked whether or not the federal government had been liable to dropping Thursday’s vote, they stated “no”.

A privileges committee inquiry may very well be extremely damaging even when Johnson is finally not formally censured. It would come with the fitting to demand greater than 300 images believed to have been collated by the unique inquiry into rule-breaking by Gray, which have been handed to the Metropolitan police.

Sir Charles Walker, the vice-chair of the 1922 Committee of backbenchers, informed the BBC he would “probably” abstain at Thursday’s vote however stated he wouldn’t vote with Labour.

“As much as I am deeply annoyed at what went on in No 10, I am also not in a position where I have much goodwill towards a Labour party who, in my view, failed to advance any form of arguments or raise any of its own concerns about the consequences of a 20-month lockdown.”

Thursday’s movement offers 4 examples of Johnson assuring MPs, together with him being “repeatedly assured since these allegations emerged that there was no party and that no Covid rules were broken”.

The movement additionally says the inquiry ought to start after the conclusion of the Met investigation, with Johnson anticipated to obtain a minimum of three extra fines for breaches within the coming weeks.

Labour sources stated that they had drafted the movement to permit the least attainable wriggle room for Tory MPs. “This is not our first rodeo,” a senior aide stated. “They’re looking for a life raft to try and desperately hold on to.”

A former Tory minister insisted they might refuse to vote in opposition to the movement unamended, saying: “How can I say he’s completely innocent but there’s no need for an investigation to prove it?” Another MP stated he had warned whips there can be a minimum of 30 abstentions until they devised an off-ramp.

Plenty of Conservative MPs stated that they had privately urged whips to provide you with an answer. “It’s untenable for me to vote to block an investigation if I’m to defend the PM with my constituents,” a backbencher stated.

Some had urged Johnson to get forward of Starmer’s ploy by referring himself to the privileges committee to dispel strategies of one other cover up. “If you can’t escape it, you might as well get on the front foot,” stated one. Government sources stated that possibility had been rejected.

But all through Wednesday MPs continued to make the argument that Johnson ought to permit the investigation to happen. A former cupboard minister requested: “How on earth could anyone oppose it?” They stated the federal government ought to wave the movement via after which “kill it off” within the committee.

Labour additionally moved to blunt arguments from the Tory whips {that a} Partygate inquiry can be prejudiced as a result of it will be chaired by Labour’s Chris Bryant, a fierce critic of the prime minister. One MP stated Johnson had dubbed it “the Bryant committee”.

On Wednesday Bryant recused himself from any future inquiry due to his previous feedback criticising Johnson. The Guardian understands Bryant went to see Sir Graham Brady, the chair of the 1922 group, on Wednesday and informed him he would recuse himself, prompting aid amongst backbench Tories that they might vote for the movement.

In an open letter to colleagues, Bryant stated he believed he would have been in a position to chair the inquiry pretty however that it was necessary for the committee to be seen to proceed “without any imputation of unfairness”.

Labour sources stated Bryant’s recusal had broken Johnson’s argument that the proposed investigation was fully politically motivated. The Tory MP Bernard Jenkin is anticipated to chair any inquiry in Bryant’s absence.

Speaking to journalists on the flight to India, Johnson emphasised that he had extra necessary priorities than the inquiry into lockdown breaches. “You’re better off talking about things other than politicians themselves,” he stated. “The best thing to do for the people, for parliament, is to get on and focus on the things we were elected to do.”

But the Partygate inquiry row infected recollections of the Owen Paterson sleaze scandal, the place livid MPs informed Johnson that they had been humiliated by makes an attempt to change the parliamentary disciplinary system final year for MPs so as to shield the previous cupboard minister from censure.

A Labour supply stated: “It’s clear Tory MPs are done defending the widespread criminality we’ve seen in No 10 … That’s why Tory whips obviously knew that they couldn’t vote this down. They clearly haven’t learnt a thing from the mess they got into over Owen Paterson. Boris Johnson is trying to rig the rules to deflect from his own law-breaking. Any Tory MP who votes for this is voting for a cover-up.”

Back to top button