UK News

Home Office Rwanda deportation flight given go-ahead in High Court ruling

The Home Office’s first flight carrying asylum-seekers to Rwanda has been given the go-ahead by the High Court in London after campaigners lost a bid to halt it.

A decide refused to grant an injunction to forestall the primary journey in the controversial scheme, scheduled to go away on Tuesday with 31 asylum-seekers onboard.

Up to 130 folks have been notified they might be eliminated beneath the scheme, and the Home Office is planning to schedule extra this year.

Mr Justice Swift granted the claimants permission to attraction, suggesting Court of Appeal judges would hear the case on Monday.

In his ruling, he additionally denied interim aid to 2 individuals who face removing to Rwanda.

Court paperwork revealed the Home Office cancelled deportations to Rwanda for 5 migrants who appealed to the High Court.

Charity Care4Calais, the Public and Commercial Services union (PCS) and strain group Detention Action sought a judicial review of the scheme, which they’ve branded illegal.

The High Court heard the coverage to take away folks to Rwanda was illegal in half as a result of it was “irrational”.

Raza Husain QC, for the folks and teams bringing the declare, mentioned: “The secretary of state’s conclusion as to the safety of Rwanda was irrational. We have a very strong case on that.”

The court docket was instructed that the UN refugee company, the UNHCR, had plenty of issues concerning the asylum course of in Rwanda, together with discriminatory entry to asylum – together with for LGBT folks – a scarcity of authorized illustration and interpreters and difficulties in interesting.

“The UNHCR has serious concerns that asylum-seekers will not have access to a firm and fair procedure for the determination of refugee status,” Mr Husain added.

The authorities has argued the scheme will cease harmful Channel crossings


Laura Dubinsky QC, for the UNHCR, mentioned “in the light of inaccuracies” she wished to make clear that the UNHCR in no method endorsed the UK-Rwanda association. She mentioned the UNHCR had knowledgeable the house secretary that it was illegal.

In a written submission, the Home Office mentioned removing to Rwanda “pursues an important public interest, adding the deportations are “intended to deter” folks from making harmful small boat journeys to the UK to assert asylum.

The court docket additionally heard that the Home Office could have additional deliberate deportation flights to Rwanda.

Mathew Gullick QC mentioned: “The Home Office does intend to make arrangements for a further flight or flights to Rwanda this year.”

Asked about flights earlier than the total listening to by the tip of July, he continued: “That will depend on how many individuals leave on the flight on Tuesday.”

Keir Starmer has known as the plan a ‘chaotic diversion’

(PA Wire)

The Asylum Aid charity is bringing a separate case on Monday about the way in which in which the coverage is being launched. Individual migrants are additionally set to deliver authorized challenges.

Labour chief Sir Keir Starmer known as the plan a “chaotic diversion”, saying Labour as a substitute would type “a proper plan with the French authorities” to sort out people-smuggling.

When requested what Labour’s different to the coverage can be, he mentioned: “I think it’s very important that we all say, loud and clear, that we don’t want anybody making that dangerous crossing across the Channel.

“We don’t want these people-smugglers to make profit from their business and we need to go after them hard.”

Home secretary Priti Patel welcomed the ruling, saying the federal government will “now continue to deliver on progressing our world-leading Migration Partnership”.

Priti Patel and Rwandan minister Vincent Biruta signing the deal in April


Ms Patel mentioned: “People will continue to try and prevent their relocation through legal challenges and last-minute claims, but we will not be deterred in breaking the deadly people smuggling trade and ultimately saving lives.

“Rwanda is a safe country and has previously been recognised for providing a safe haven for refugees – we will continue preparations for the first flight to Rwanda, alongside the range of other measures intended to reduce small boat crossings.”

Shortly after his ruling, Mr Justice Swift granted the claimants permission to attraction, suggesting Court of Appeal judges would hear the case on Monday.

Campaigners mentioned they have been “disappointed” with the choice however that they’d attraction.

After the ruling, the PCS union additionally tweeted that it “has called for urgent talks with home secretary Priti Patel on her Rwanda removal policy following a High Court ruling today”.

Detention Action mentioned: “Our application has already been granted to appeal the High Court decision allowing next week’s Rwanda flight.

“Our appeal will be heard on Monday & our larger legal case against this policy will be heard over the coming weeks. Thanks to all those standing with us.”

Asylum Aid mentioned: “The truncated timeframes are unlawful and unfair, and this argument still has to be heard.”

Sonya Sceats, chief government at Freedom from Torture, mentioned: “We are disappointed that the court did not grant this injunction to ensure that nobody is sent to Rwanda before Boris Johnson’s cruel policy can be subjected to proper legal scrutiny.

“But the fight is far from over. Caring people across Britain are incensed that this government wants to send people seeking safety halfway across the world and are taking action.”

Back to top button