Head of Tavistock clinic cuts ties with parents of trans children over their ‘transphobic’ views

The head of England’s solely NHS gender clinic lower ties with some parents of transgender children after claiming they promoted “transphobic” gender-critical views, The Telegraph can reveal.

Whistleblowers have raised issues in regards to the strategy to gender-questioning youngsters on the Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust, with one former governor Dr David Bell calling it a “gateway to puberty blockers”.

Last month, the Cass Review into NHS gender id companies, led by one of the nation’s prime paediatricians, discovered some medical doctors really feel “pressured to adopt an unquestioning approach”, a stance that’s advocated by some trans foyer teams.

Referrals to the belief’s controversial Gender Identity Development Service (GIDS) have soared through the pandemic, with the ready listing for children at round 5,500.

Now it has emerged that each the chief government and chairman of the Trust instructed a gaggle of parents they have been “disappointed” at their gender-critical views – the concept that organic intercourse is binary and immutable – and lower ties upon studying of this.

Bayswater Support Group, a gaggle of 400 parents many of whom have children being handled by the Tavistock, complained to the Trust final year about “defamatory” feedback made about them by a GIDS clinician, who The Telegraph is just not naming, on a Facebook group for psychiatrists. They additionally made one other grievance final month following recent feedback alleging the group had “transphobic” hyperlinks.

In response, Paul Jenkins, the Trust’s chief government, threw out the grievance following an investigation as a result of the Trust discovered that the clinician was commenting in a personal capability.

Parents accused of ‘clear lack of stability’

However, in an official letter to the parents final May, Mr Jenkins added: “As part of the investigation we were disappointed to see that all the links on your site are to gender-critical sites. We were also very disappointed to see social media activity that demonstrated a clear lack of balance and moderation in how issues were covered.”

He mentioned it was “a considerable disappointment, therefore, to see this material which I am afraid will make it difficult for the service to work with you in future”.

Bayswater, which rejects any accusation of transphobia, has a web site with hyperlinks to mainstream organisations and recommendation for parents involved about evidence-based gender look after children and the affect of “affirmative” trans charities corresponding to Mermaids and Stonewall.

The group’s surveys of its parents have discovered 50 per cent of their children got here out as homosexual earlier than figuring out as trans, and 80 per cent had been bullied at college.

Campaigners argue this exhibits why the Government is correct to exclude trans points from the conversion remedy ban, to permit counsellors to discover wider causes for id confusion.

The group of parents identified in letters with the Trust that NHS England, which has contracted the Tavistock to run gender id companies, requires it to “collaborate and engage with community groups which deliver services to clients with gender dysphoria and their family/carers”.

Prior to the letters final year, the group had held conferences with the Trust to share its perception.

When the parents escalated the grievance to the Trust’s chairman, Prof Paul Burstow, he replied final June to say he did “not see any reason to overturn his conclusion in respect of the transphobic links on your website which were referred to in a private Facebook group”.

Prof Burstow mentioned that whereas he was open to participating with “all parents”, the group was “not neutral” and its web site “makes it more difficult to have a constructive dialogue”.

Worry over irreversible therapies

One mom, whose 16-year-old youngster has been on the Tavistock ready listing for 2 and a half years, instructed The Telegraph: “I consented to my daughter’s Tavistock referral because I trusted the NHS, and believed that the clinic would take an exploratory approach.

“Now, I worry that her self-diagnosis of gender dysphoria will lead to irreversible treatments she may later regret.

“My daughter’s school introduced her to the concept of gender identity, but kept the contents of lessons and presentations by activists secret. Then, they changed her name and pronouns without our consent.

“If a teenage girl who was lesbian is now a straight male, is it not the case that she underwent gay conversion therapy at school?”

The Tavistock’s GIDS clinic was rated “inadequate” by the Care Quality Commission final January, however its employees have defended the assist it gives to gender-distressed children.

A spokesperson for Bayswater Support Group added: “We are surprised that an NHS clinic refuses to engage with parents on ideological grounds, especially when our concerns are evidence-based and reflect many of the issues raised in the recent Cass Review interim statement.

“Why are the views of groups such as Mermaids and Stonewall taken into account, but not ours?”

A spokesperson for the Trust mentioned: “The Gender Identity Development Service works with every young person on a case-by-case basis, supporting them as they explore their gender identity development, with no expectation about what might be the outcome for any given individual.

“The Trust opposes conversion therapy for gay and trans people, and cannot work with groups affiliated with those who seek particular outcomes for these vulnerable young people.”

Back to top button