Auto

Elderly drivers: Maximum driving age proposals are ‘unfair’ and ‘unfaithful’ as youth blamed

Social media customers and Express.co.uk commenters had been up in arms over solutions for the Government to introduce a most driving age. This was proposed as a technique to preserve roads protected and to make sure that everybody on the street was protected to be behind the wheel.

Keith Hawes, Director of Nationwide Vehicle Contracts, helps aged drivers’ criticism of the proposals.

He stated: “Elderly drivers are constantly unfairly targeted for being the cause of many road traffic accidents.

“However, research proves any scrutiny of elderly drivers is untrue.

“For instance, it is known that younger drivers (aged between 17 and 21) are three to four times more likely to be involved in accidents than elderly drivers.

READ MORE: Andy Burnham scraps daily charging for petrol and diesel vehicles

He added: “Such a policy would only alienate the elderly from society by limiting their mobility and reducing their independence. 

“It would also increase the complications elderly people face when attending things like social events, hospital appointments, etc.

“The UK’s ageing population is going to cause a considerable demographic shift over the coming years. 

“Limiting the mobility of the elderly also adds to the burden of care faced by caregivers across the country. 

“In my opinion, this policy is a complete no-go.”

According to information from the Older Drivers Task Force, there can be multiple million motorists over the age of 85 by 2025.

Because of this, the organisation advisable that the DVLA ought to require proof of an eyesight take a look at at age 75.

It stated the DVLA, insurers and others also needs to encourage imaginative and prescient checks each two years, significantly from age 60.

Back to top button