Politics

Boris Johnson’s no-confidence vote: Raab urges rebels to respect result as former leader says PM should quit – live | Politics

Raab urges rebels to respect result as former leader William Hague says PM should quit

Good morning. We like to assume that elections and votes can resolve political disputes, and supply a component of closure. It is likely one of the causes journalists cover them so intensely. But, after all, generally they don’t, and final night time’s no-confidence poll in Boris Johnson’s management is a traditional instance. Tory MPs hoped that, a method or one other, it will terminate the disaster. Yet it hasn’t, and Johnson’s dysfunctional authorities psychodrama is again for an additional season.

Dominic Raab, the justice secretary and deputy prime minister, was doing the interview spherical this morning and he urged Johnson’s opponents within the get together to respect the result and transfer on. He instructed Sky News:

The prime minister received it with 59%, that’s truly greater than he bought by way of help when he was elected leader of the Conservative get together.

But we’ve got had that vote now, I believe it was the prerogative of these calling for it to have it, the prime minister received it clearly, he received it by 63 votes … and now an important factor I believe is to respect that result and to transfer ahead.

Raab is a former overseas secretary. But one other former overseas secretary, William Hague, who can be a former Tory leader, and somebody who was in parliament when Margaret Thatcher and John Major had been going through management challenges, has come to a special conclusion. In his column in the Times, Hague says that Johnson’s position is now untenable and that he should quit. He says:

While I by no means confronted a vote of no confidence in my 4 years as opposition leader, I’d have regarded my position as utterly untenable if greater than a 3rd of my MPs had ever voted in opposition to me. John Major was completely prepared to resign in 1995 if he had not received the help of a really giant majority of the get together. If, with all the facility of the get together management, all of the years of acquaintance with MPs, all of the information they’ve of your talents and plans, you continue to can not crush a vote of no confidence by a commanding margin, then not solely is the writing on the wall however it’s chiselled in stone and won’t wash away …

No particular person in politics issues greater than the well being of our democracy. That well being will depend on voters having religion within the integrity of leaders even when they disagree with them, respect for a way authorities is performed, and a aggressive selection at a future election. The votes simply cast present {that a} very giant a part of the Conservative get together can not see Johnson offering that.

Hague additionally argues that there are two types of rebellions in opposition to a celebration leader. Major and Theresa May each confronted tried coups by organised factions with an agenda. But the anti-Johnson marketing campaign was “more disparate, less organised but more spontaneous”, triggered by the truth that many alternative teams within the get together have lost religion in him. A riot of this kind introduced down Iain Duncan Smith in 2003, Hague says. He goes on:

The nature of their revolt has an essential bearing on what occurs subsequent. They should not a faction that has been seen off, or another coverage route that has been defeated. They symbolize as an alternative a widespread feeling, a collapse of religion, that just about actually can’t be repaired or reversed. For Johnson, persevering with to lead the get together after such a revolt will show to be unsustainable.

Hague says Johnson should settle for that he can’t get better and resign.

While Johnson has survived the night time, the injury accomplished to his premiership is extreme. Words have been stated that can’t be retracted, studies printed that can’t be erased, and votes have been cast that present a larger degree of rejection than any Tory leader has ever endured and survived. Deep inside, he should recognise that, and switch his thoughts to getting out in a manner that spares get together and nation such agonies and uncertainties.

I will probably be protecting extra response to final night time’s vote all through the day.

Here is the agenda for the day.

Morning: Boris Johnson chairs cupboard.

10am: Lord Frost, the former Brexit minister, offers proof to the Commons public administration and constitutional affairs committee.

11.30am: Downing Street holds a foyer briefing.

12.30pm: Wes Streeting, the shadow well being secretary, holds a Q&A on the Institute for Government thinktank.

After 12.30pm: MPs start debating a Labour movement saying the federal government should implement in full Committee on Standards in Public Life proposals to beef up the ministerial code.

4.45pm: Sajid Javid, the well being secretary, offers proof to the Commons well being committee about staffing within the NHS.

I strive to monitor the feedback under the road (BTL) however it’s unattainable to learn all of them. If you will have a direct question, do embody “Andrew” in it someplace and I’m extra seemingly to discover it. I do strive to answer questions, and if they’re of common curiosity, I’ll publish the question and reply above the road (ATL), though I can’t promise to do that for everybody.

If you need to entice my consideration rapidly, it’s most likely higher to use Twitter. I’m on @AndrewSparrow.

Alternatively, you may e-mail me at [email protected]

Raab performs down significance of potential Tory defeats in two byelections later this month

Here is a abstract of the details from Dominic Raab’s interviews this morning.

  • Raab, the justice secretary and deputy first minister, urged the Tory rebels to settle for the result of final night time’s vote. (See 9.23am.) He instructed LBC:

I believe we draw a line within the sand after this vote, it was clearly and decisively received.

  • He claimed the get together might unite round its coverage agenda. He stated:

There’s an enormous quantity, while you have a look at our coverage agenda that binds us collectively, that’s the way in which it’s within the Conservative get together.

And I believe the very best ahead – momentum – will probably be to concentrate on that, as a result of that’s the stuff that the folks within the nation, from the cities to the shires and the suburbs and in every single place in between, need us centered on.

This declare ignores the truth that, for some MPs who voted in opposition to Boris Johnson yesterday, coverage variations had been significance, and never simply Pargygate. See, for instance, what Jesse Norman, the former Treasury minister, stated in his open letter explaining why he couldn’t again the PM.

  • Raab rejected claims that Johnson was in a worse position than Theresa May in December 2018. The May comparability was cited by many individuals final night time as a result of 37% of May’s MPs voted in opposition to her in a no-confidence movement and he or she resigned six months later. Yesterday 41% of Tory MPs voted in opposition to Johnson. But his position was totally different, Raab argued. He instructed ITV’s Good Morning Britain:

We received the most important majority since 1987 in 2019, and that’s very totally different from, for instance, the state of affairs Theresa May discovered herself in as a result of there was a hung parliament.

  • He stated that if the Tories had been to lose the 2 byelections later this month, in Wakefield and in Tiverton and Honiton, that will not imply defeat on the common election was inevitable. He defined:

By-elections are sometimes a chance for a protest vote in a manner {that a} common election isn’t. Governments of the day typically lose by-elections to go on to win them at a common election.

He pressured that the get together was doing every thing it might to win each byelections, nevertheless it sounded as if was conceding that defeat was extra seemingly.

At cupboard this morning Boris Johnson will argue that the federal government is delivering on what issues to the general public, No 10 says. It has issued a information launch saying Johnson will inform his colleagues:

This is a authorities that delivers on what the folks of this nation care about most.

We have pledged £37bn to help households with their funds, made our communities safer by means of hiring 13,500 extra law enforcement officials, and tackled the Covid backlogs within the NHS by opening practically 100 neighborhood diagnostic centres so folks can entry care nearer to dwelling.

Today, I pledge to proceed delivering on these priorities. We are on the facet of hard-working British folks, and we’re going to get on with the job.

What papers say about Tory vote on Johnson

My colleague Martin Farrer has a round-up of how the nationwide papers are protecting the no-confidence vote yesterday. The Daily Mail and the Daily Express have a pro-Johnson gloss on their splash protection, however elsewhere the protection is way more unfavorable for No 10, and even the Daily Telegraph, Johnson’s former employer and a paper he values a lot he used to call it his “real boss”, offers little consolation.

Rebels warn Johnson guidelines may very well be modified to enable one other problem

Rebel Conservatives have given Boris Johnson till the get together convention to change route or they warn guidelines may very well be altered to enable one other problem, my colleague Jessica Elgot studies.

Raab urges rebels to respect result as former leader William Hague says PM should quit

Good morning. We like to assume that elections and votes can resolve political disputes, and supply a component of closure. It is likely one of the causes journalists cover them so intensely. But, after all, generally they don’t, and final night time’s no-confidence poll in Boris Johnson’s management is a traditional instance. Tory MPs hoped that, a method or one other, it will terminate the disaster. Yet it hasn’t, and Johnson’s dysfunctional authorities psychodrama is again for an additional season.

Dominic Raab, the justice secretary and deputy prime minister, was doing the interview spherical this morning and he urged Johnson’s opponents within the get together to respect the result and transfer on. He instructed Sky News:

The prime minister received it with 59%, that’s truly greater than he bought by way of help when he was elected leader of the Conservative get together.

But we’ve got had that vote now, I believe it was the prerogative of these calling for it to have it, the prime minister received it clearly, he received it by 63 votes … and now an important factor I believe is to respect that result and to transfer ahead.

Raab is a former overseas secretary. But one other former overseas secretary, William Hague, who can be a former Tory leader, and somebody who was in parliament when Margaret Thatcher and John Major had been going through management challenges, has come to a special conclusion. In his column in the Times, Hague says that Johnson’s position is now untenable and that he should quit. He says:

While I by no means confronted a vote of no confidence in my 4 years as opposition leader, I’d have regarded my position as utterly untenable if greater than a 3rd of my MPs had ever voted in opposition to me. John Major was completely prepared to resign in 1995 if he had not received the help of a really giant majority of the get together. If, with all the facility of the get together management, all of the years of acquaintance with MPs, all of the information they’ve of your talents and plans, you continue to can not crush a vote of no confidence by a commanding margin, then not solely is the writing on the wall however it’s chiselled in stone and won’t wash away …

No particular person in politics issues greater than the well being of our democracy. That well being will depend on voters having religion within the integrity of leaders even when they disagree with them, respect for a way authorities is performed, and a aggressive selection at a future election. The votes simply cast present {that a} very giant a part of the Conservative get together can not see Johnson offering that.

Hague additionally argues that there are two types of rebellions in opposition to a celebration leader. Major and Theresa May each confronted tried coups by organised factions with an agenda. But the anti-Johnson marketing campaign was “more disparate, less organised but more spontaneous”, triggered by the truth that many alternative teams within the get together have lost religion in him. A riot of this kind introduced down Iain Duncan Smith in 2003, Hague says. He goes on:

The nature of their revolt has an essential bearing on what occurs subsequent. They should not a faction that has been seen off, or another coverage route that has been defeated. They symbolize as an alternative a widespread feeling, a collapse of religion, that just about actually can’t be repaired or reversed. For Johnson, persevering with to lead the get together after such a revolt will show to be unsustainable.

Hague says Johnson should settle for that he can’t get better and resign.

While Johnson has survived the night time, the injury accomplished to his premiership is extreme. Words have been stated that can’t be retracted, studies printed that can’t be erased, and votes have been cast that present a larger degree of rejection than any Tory leader has ever endured and survived. Deep inside, he should recognise that, and switch his thoughts to getting out in a manner that spares get together and nation such agonies and uncertainties.

I will probably be protecting extra response to final night time’s vote all through the day.

Here is the agenda for the day.

Morning: Boris Johnson chairs cupboard.

10am: Lord Frost, the former Brexit minister, offers proof to the Commons public administration and constitutional affairs committee.

11.30am: Downing Street holds a foyer briefing.

12.30pm: Wes Streeting, the shadow well being secretary, holds a Q&A on the Institute for Government thinktank.

After 12.30pm: MPs start debating a Labour movement saying the federal government should implement in full Committee on Standards in Public Life proposals to beef up the ministerial code.

4.45pm: Sajid Javid, the well being secretary, offers proof to the Commons well being committee about staffing within the NHS.

I strive to monitor the feedback under the road (BTL) however it’s unattainable to learn all of them. If you will have a direct question, do embody “Andrew” in it someplace and I’m extra seemingly to discover it. I do strive to answer questions, and if they’re of common curiosity, I’ll publish the question and reply above the road (ATL), though I can’t promise to do that for everybody.

If you need to entice my consideration rapidly, it’s most likely higher to use Twitter. I’m on @AndrewSparrow.

Alternatively, you may e-mail me at [email protected]

Back to top button